|
Post by Mr. Slick on Sept 3, 2008 11:18:59 GMT -6
Well, since BGN is over and the 6 lane track has been tuned up, should we switch to using the 6 lane track instead of the 3 lane track? The advantage is that the racing would take less time. Potential disadvantage is that the 6 lane track will be used lots more then the 3 lane track configuration would be and I'll have to be spending more time cleaning it each month. . . which is probably a good thing anyway!
|
|
|
Post by beakerboysracing on Sept 3, 2008 11:39:19 GMT -6
I really liked the six lane track but I have to vote for the three lane. Though the 6 lane track appears to be faster, I had a hard time keeping up with what car was running, in what lane, who won, and all that kinda stuff. Maybe my brain is getting a little old, just seems like too much information to take in during the racing action on a 6 lane track. :PMaybe use the six lane for special occasions, like Big Rig races, or you could just donate it to me.......... ;D
Scott
Beakerboys
|
|
|
Post by Lucky 13 on Sept 3, 2008 13:50:44 GMT -6
The 6 lane is awesome and was a show saver for the BGN but I like the 3 lane for our regular proxy races.
Lucky 13
|
|
|
Post by docb on Sept 3, 2008 14:35:12 GMT -6
My vote is for the 3 lane.
|
|
|
Post by Barga Racing on Sept 3, 2008 18:57:49 GMT -6
I say stick with the 3 lane for proxy otherwise all the records need reset again. I also think it would be great to pull the 6 lane out for all live and/or special occasion races.
|
|
|
Post by Knothead Racing on Sept 3, 2008 18:59:44 GMT -6
I’m in for the three lane. Less variation.
Unless you think that the six lane will help my times.
|
|
|
Post by 3cubdad on Sept 3, 2008 21:40:10 GMT -6
Gotta agree with the majority. I love the 6 lane for the big races in person, but it's hard enough to follow on-line with the 3 lane!
|
|